|
| |
AN
ASSESSMENT OF THE CHANGE IN THE INCIDENCE OF
EARNINGS
MANAGEMENT AROUND THE ENRON-ANDERSEN EPISODE
|
Forthcoming
in The Review of Accounting and Finance, Volume 4, Number 1 (2005)
In 2001 Enron
filed amended financial statements setting off a chain of events
starting with its bankruptcy filing and including the conviction of
Arthur Andersen for obstruction of justice.
The end of 2001 and the first half of 2002 included a heightened
level of publicity for the accounting practices of listed companies.
This paper addresses whether there was a detectable change in the
incidence of earnings management around this time period.
Earnings reports
released in 2001 and 2002 were analyzed.
The results showed that revenue numbers were subject to upwards
management. Benford’s Law
was used to detect such manipulations.
Earnings Per Share (EPS) numbers showed a marked discontinuity in
the distribution around zero which is consistent with upwards
management. The results also showed a tendency towards neat round EPS
numbers such as 0.10, 0.20, etc. The
overall results are consistent with a small but noticeable increase in
earnings management in 2002. Enron’s
reported numbers are reviewed and these show a strong tendency towards
making financial thresholds.
|
Keywords:
|
Earnings Quality, Earnings Management, Earnings Per Share, Benford’s
Law.
|
|
Data Availability:
|
The
earnings numbers in this study were obtained from the Digest of
Earnings Reports published in The Wall Street Journal in
April and May, 2001 and April and May, 2002.
|
Copyright © 2002-2004
by Mark J. Nigrini. All
rights reserved.
I wish to thank participants at the annual meeting of the E&Y CARAT
at the University of Kansas for their comments. I also wish to thank Jeff Archambault, Mary Curtis, Charles
Davis, James Livingston, and Ram Natarajan for their reviews and
suggestions on the first version of this paper.
Thanks are also due to the editor, Ahmed Riahi-Belkaoui, and the
two reviewers for their constructive reviews and editorial suggestions.
Forthcoming
in The Review of Accounting and Finance, Volume 4, Number 1 (2005)
|
|